METADATA Geomatics Laboratory Energy & Geoscience Institute Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Utah 423 Wakara Way, Suite 300 Salt Lake City, Utah 84108 IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION Data Set Identity: Map showing Geothermal Gradients & Related Features, Quest Leasehold & Vicinty, Dixie Valley, Nevada Theme Key Words: Geothermal gradient, Dixie Valley, Navada, Isothermal contours Geographic Area: Dixie Valley, Nevada, USA Spatial Object Types: Line, point. Intended Scale(s) of Use: ~1:63,360 Data Resolution: N/A Reference: Koenig, J. B., R. W. Greensfelder, and C. W. Klein, 1976, Geothermal Potenrial of the Quest Leasehold, Dixie Valley, Nevada; Map showing Geothermal Gradients & Related Features, Quest Leasehold & Vicinty, Dixie Valley, Nevada, GeotherEx, Inc., Plate 13 Coordinate and Thematic Precision: Good Theme Names: 300ft_cont, Isotherm_cont, Features, testsite, and Wells_tobe_drilled FINAL PROJECTION INFORMATION Projection Name: UTM Datum: Clarke 1866 Geoid: NAD 27 Projection Units: Meters Other Projection Parameters: UTM Zone 11 Map Extent: Lower Left: 404,779.58mE; 4,402,600.34mN Upper Right: 431,419.48mE; 4,428,258.77mN SOURCE INFORMATION Source Reference: Same as above reference Source Medium: Analog (paper) Source Scale: ~1:63,360 Source Projection: Unknown, Geographic coordinates - latitude/longitude Source Geoid: Assummed Clarke 1866 Source Datum: Assummed Clarke 1866 Source Units: degrees Source Other Projection Parameters: N/A ACCESS INFORMATION Transfer Mode: WWW Native Size: 9.23 KB Archives Size: 5.27 KB DATA ORIGINATOR Contact Person: GIS Tech. - Chris Kessler (801)585-9771 Alternate Contact: Geomatics Unit Leader- Greg Nash (801)585-3889 Contact Organization: EGI Contact E-mail: cevens@egi.utah.edu Alternate E-mail: nash@egi.utah.edu STATUS INFORMATION Completion Status: Completed Completion Date: April 25, 1997 Geographic Area Completed: Dixie Valley, Nevada Update Frequency: Updated 10/6/97, accuracy check Release Information: Not proprietary. ACCURACY INFORMATION RMS Error: 0.006 Accuracy Checked: No Accuracy Information Source: Original analog map and DLG road map Spatial Accuracy: Good in relation to original analog map and DLG road map. Thematic Accuracy: good in relation to original analog map